{{item.title}}
The F-35 combat aircraft. The M1 Abrams main battle tank. India’s light combat aircraft, the Tejas, and the JF-17, Pakistan and China’s light combat aircraft. Such flagship defence programmes evoke national pride in the countries that produce and operate them. They build the domestic defence industry, inspiring contractors and suppliers to innovate. These flagship programmes meet their armed forces’ strategic needs, allowing them to field differentiated defence products that enable mission success. These products strengthen geopolitical relations by establishing credibility and deterrence, and through exports. GCC countries are already building their military industries. Embarking on flagship programmes is the next step.
Defence flagship programmes are intricate, multi-year endeavours. They encompass many layers of complexity and involve multiple players—including ministries, armed forces, defence companies, academia, research institutes, and foreign suppliers. Before deciding which platform to build, governments should grasp their geopolitical, financial, security, and strategic priorities. That understanding allows a flagship programme to deal with actual and anticipated national security threats, whether conventional or asymmetric, including the capabilities of potential adversaries. This initial step also provides the holistic metrics for flagship progress, which include the contribution to national security, technological advances, the deepening of the national talent pool, and financial viability.
Governments also should perform something akin to an audit of national capabilities because flagship programmes must mobilise them to succeed. They must know their capabilities in terms of defence industry, financing, industrial production, international scientific collaboration, innovation, research and development (R&D), skilled workers, and technological prowess. Areas of strength in innovation, for example, identify which path to follow. Knowing the state of international research protects intellectual property and allows technology transfer that augments national capabilities.
Governments should assess the current defence inventory, another layer of complexity. A flagship programme replaces existing platforms, demanding adjustments in doctrine and training—as when the U.K. reintroduced conventional aircraft carriers following a gap of 38 years. Governments should synchronize platform transitions so operational capabilities remain constant. Simultaneous with that focus on current operational concerns, military end-users of the flagship product should not focus overly on immediate operational needs. Instead, armed forces should consider force development and how a flagship programme delivers future mission success.
Once a government grasps these starting points and strengths, it should pursue a multifaceted strategy of enablers, policies, and regulations. *Click to explore the pillars of a flagship program.
1
Strategic communication and transparency
2
Collaborative research and development
3
Strong domestic supplier base
1
Financial incentives
2
Procurement
3
Talent attraction
Flagship defence programmes are tremendous undertakings, fraught with considerable risk and promising substantial rewards. As GCC countries scale up their defence industries, a flagship programme is the audacious next step.
This article originally appeared in Defence and Security Middle East, December 2023.
Menu